Diskussionsbeiträge der Projektgruppe Friedensforschung Konstanz, Nr. 53, 2004

2
Evaluation of the war partie's rights and intentions
D2
De-escalation-oriented pole: Balance
  D2.3 Emphasis on common interests and/or description of the (concrete) benefits that both sides could gain from ending the war
 
 
 
Example D2.3.1 Südkurier, 12.01.1952
Eine Träumerei von Robert Schuman
 
Example D2.3.2 Frankfurter Rundschau, 7.10.2000
Partner Serbien
 
Example D2.3.3 Frankfurter Rundschau, 2.4.2001
Der Prozess
 
E2.3
Escalation-oriented counterpart: Denial of common interests or emphasis on incompability of interests, culture etc.

back to documents
back to overview

© 2004 by verlag irena regener berlin